The industry publication Presstime covered the results of the API’s design seminar in its October, 1988 edition. The article’s lede:
Two dozen movers and shakers in the field of newspaper design pondered the substance and form of 21st century newspapers at the American Press Institute’s annual J. Montgomery Curtis Memorial Seminar.
The round-table seminar, conducted at the institute in Reston, Va., Sept. 11-13, used as a focal point hypothetical front pages dated 2000 and beyond that were designed by participants and posted on the walls of the seminar room.
Ironic, isn’t it: “posted on the walls…”
I got a mention for my presentation on the future of graphics:
Howard I. Finberg, assistant managing editor of The Arizona Republic, said the overwhelming majority of editors he questioned predicted graphics will play a greater part in newspapers in the year 2000. But this priority seems to shrink when talk turns to money: The editors told Finberg they would spend 70 percent of any extra funds for reporting and editing, and only 10 percent for graphics.
Sad and not surprising. Given the visual nature of the Internet, would newspapers be in a better position today if they had invested in something other than words? Just wondering.