“Website” Items

CNI’s Web Strategy Meeting, 1999

Generated by AI, Edited by Human

The March 15, 1999 memo titled “Web Strategy: Steering Committee Working Draft” was prepared for Central Newspapers, Inc. (CNI). It outlines a proposed strategic framework for how CNI should develop and manage its web presence across its various newspapers.

Key elements of the document include:

  • Need for Strategy and Coordination: Recognizing the fragmented and inconsistent web efforts across CNI properties, the memo proposes the creation of a Web Steering Committee to guide future development and unify strategy.

  • Editorial Control and Brand Integrity: Emphasis is placed on maintaining editorial standards and protecting the credibility of CNI’s newspaper brands online. The document highlights the importance of balancing innovation with journalistic values.

  • Business Goals: The memo acknowledges the growing commercial importance of the web and recommends that online efforts be aligned with broader business strategies, including advertising and revenue models.

  • Technology and Staffing: It notes the need for investment in technical infrastructure, training, and possibly new staff roles to support digital operations effectively.

  • Shared Resources and Collaboration: Proposes that CNI newspapers share best practices and technical solutions to avoid duplication of effort and benefit from economies of scale.

This draft represents an early, structured attempt by a traditional newspaper group to grapple with the implications of the digital transition, both operationally and editorially.

Retrospective (From 2025)

Looking back from 2025, this 1999 memo reads as a snapshot of a legacy media company at the edge of digital transformation. It captures the moment when the internet shifted from an experimental add-on to a core business and editorial concern.

While the memo does not predict the scale or speed of disruption that would follow—especially the impact of mobile, social media, and platform-driven distribution—it reveals a strong awareness that digital would require structural and cultural change. The idea of a centralized steering committee to shape digital policy foreshadows modern media governance models around digital ethics, product integration, and content monetization.

Ultimately, this document illustrates how media organizations like CNI were beginning to rethink their identity—not just as print publishers, but as multi-platform content providers. It’s a foundational artifact of journalism’s transition into the 21st century.

Driving Web to Print

At the 2002 IFRA Asia Conference in Bangkok (held March 20–22, 2002), I presented findings from a research project close to my heart—one that explored how newspapers could actually increase print subscriptions using their websites. Yes, increase. At the time, this idea ran counter to the conventional wisdom that digital only eroded print. [This AI-generated summary is drawn my presentation slides.]

The project was a collaboration between my consultancy, Finberg-Gentry, and a number of forward-thinking circulation and online leaders across the industry. Our research included:

  • Over 100 site reviews
  • 290 responses from circulation managers
  • And dozens of in-depth interviews with media professionals

We asked a simple but often overlooked question: What if the web could help sell the newspaper?

What we found was encouraging—and revealing.

Some newspapers were already leveraging their digital platforms to drive subscriptions, but these successes had something in common: cooperation. When online and circulation teams worked together, when they shared goals and data, the results followed.

Unfortunately, that kind of collaboration was rare. Too often, subscription links were hidden “below the fold.” Technology systems didn’t talk to each other. Customer data wasn’t shared. And the user experience—especially for signing up or managing delivery—was clunky at best.

We identified several key challenges:

  • Most newspapers didn’t have an integrated system for online and print circulation.

  • Subscription buttons were buried or mislabeled—making it hard for users to take action.

  • Only 15% of papers offered web-exclusive pricing.

  • Many didn’t even allow basic customer service functions—like stopping or holding delivery—online.

But there were bright spots.

The Minneapolis Star Tribune used contests to generate over 6,000 subscription orders a year. The Poughkeepsie Journal tracked retention of web-generated subscriptions and found they performed just as well—if not better—than other channels. The Houston Chronicle developed a user-friendly online service center that set a new standard for self-service.

What all these examples showed was that technology and strategy must go hand-in-hand. We couldn’t just slap a “Subscribe” link on a site and hope it worked. We needed to design digital experiences that respected what users had come to expect—speed, convenience, clarity—and we needed to do it without forgetting the power and value of the printed product.

In the end, my presentation message was simple: web and print aren’t rivals—they’re partners. But partnership requires intent. It requires shared ownership. And, perhaps most importantly, it requires that we stop thinking in silos.

The opportunity for newspapers to increase their audiences across platforms is still very real. But it’s up to us to build the systems, culture, and customer experiences to make it happen. The full report is available on this site.